Showing posts with label Greece. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Greece. Show all posts

Thursday, August 24, 2023

Greek Week Updated. An 11-Year Review

In my research and investing I stress three things: people, structure, and value.  I look for companies that are controlled and managed by quality people, have corporate structures that align minority and majority shareholder interests and trade at valuations that are below fair value if not outright cheap. Some eleven years and change ago I travelled to Greece, invested in a handful of Greek stocks and posted about the experience (see here).  This post is a follow-up to the trip.

At the time Greece’s financial and economic meltdown was headline news. Images of riots in Athens filled TV screens while news flow centered on its overextended banks, economic decline and possible EU succession. It seemed like a vicious cycle of bad news reports pushing the market down, which caused further panic, which pushed the market down, etc.

By the time I went in late June 2012 Greece’s headline index, the Greek ATHEX Composite, had fallen by nearly 89% in USD from its November 2007 high; and was down about 53% in the previous 12-months.  In other words, it was a very ugly environment.

Been here before I started to look at Greek equities because it reminded me of the 1997/98 Asian financial crisis. In particular Indonesia, where I first started looking at equities in 1989. The crisis in Asia turned into what was possibly the best time ever to buy Indonesian stocks. Like Greece in 2012, stock valuations were very inexpensive, there was very little market activity, and news flow was dreadful with each article seemingly painting a bleaker and bleaker picture as time went on.  

Over the next few decades, Indonesian equities, particularly those of quality companies, had a stunning run. From its 1998 bottom, the headline JSX index increased by over 14x over the next ten years. Quality companies did better. Some 8% of Indonesia’s listed companies went on to become USD 100-baggers. The blue chip ‘big’ cap stock Astra International was up over 200x (see here).

Greek portfolio My July 2012 trip to Greece was time and money well spent. It would have been easier and far less costly to just invest in the US listed Greek ETF (GREK) or the two USD listed ADRs, than to spend 10-days in Athens visiting companies and talking to anybody and everybody who could tell me about the background and reputation of Greek companies and business families.

The methodology for selecting stocks is the same I use currently. I buy stocks based on the three key criteria stated in the first paragraph of this and most of my other posts. Good people, alignment of interests between minority and controlling shareholders, and generational low valuations. At the time I went, Greece was the world’s least expensive market trading at 3.6x its last ten-years inflation adjusted PE ratio. At these levels, and with all the negative news, just about everything was value so I could concentrate on quality (people and structure).

I invested in six stocks after my trip. They were Jumbo (stock symbol BELA), Public Power Corporation (PPC), OPAP–Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics (OPAP), Motor Oil Hellas (MOH), Hellenic Exchanges (EXAE), and Folli Follie (FFGRP). I dabbled in others, but this was my core long-term portfolio. They were initiated at equal weights.

    Jumbo is a retail chain of toy stores that also sells other household items. It’s family founded and still run and managed by its biggest shareholder and founder, Apostolos Vakakis (https://www.e-jumbo.gr/)

   Public Power Corporation, now known as the PPC Group, is Greece’s leading electricity producer and supplier. The government has been divesting since 2016, but retains a 34.1% stake (https://www.dei.gr/en/)

    OPAP is the largest gaming/betting company in Greece. In 2013 the Greek government sold its remaining stake to a private equity fund (https://www.opap.gr/)

    Motor Oil Hellas is one of Greece’s largest oil refining and petrol retailers. It’s controlled by the Vardinogiannis family (https://www.moh.gr/en/)

    Hellenic Exchanges, better known as the Athens Exchange Group, operates Greece’s stock exchange (https://www.athexgroup.gr/)

    Folli Follie is a retail chain of affordable luxury items such as jewelry, watches, handbags and other accessories. In 2018 it was revealed that the group’s management inflated sales and profits via fake documents with the founding and major shareholders, the Koutsolioutsos family, reaping the benefits (https://www.follifollie.com/cm-en/)

Readers should note that while I initially bought the stocks above, I did not hold this portfolio over the last eleven years. Most of the money I earned from “Greek Week” was invested in a fund I started in 2017. It uses virtually the same methodology and process I used to select stocks in Greece and elsewhere. Buy quality companies (good controlling shareholders and aligned structures) during a crisis (value).

I do however want to know how my stock picks did over time and I thought readers could benefit from a long-term perspective. In other words, the stock picks are real but the returns are - unfortunately for me - hypothetical.


Decent returns despite a big mistake  As seen in the adjacent charts and graphs my six-stock Greek portfolio did pretty well. Based on just share prices alone, its 11-year CAGR was 14.9%, or a total increase of 360.3%. Not bad and better than the S&P500 over the same period of time, which had a CAGR of 11.5%. 

Note that this includes 130bp per annum of transactions and custody fees. This is what I paid in the most recent quarter on my last remaining holding at my Greek broker. The high percentage is due to the small amount remaining in the account and the fixed/minimum payment for custody, VAT, and transaction fees such as receiving and reinvesting dividends.  Without these charges the six-stock portfolio's CAGR increases to 15.7%. 

Please note that the remainder of this post will disregard custody and other fees.

Including dividends received, and factoring in Greece’s 15% dividend withholding tax, the hypothetical return increases to 491.3%, with a CAGR of 17.5%. Another way to put this is that sticking with the core six stock portfolio over the last eleven years, and just sitting back and collecting dividends, the initial USD10,000 invested turned into USD59,100.

Reinvesting after-tax dividends further boosted returns. About 140 basis points per annum could have been added to the returns by simply collecting after-tax dividends and buying stock in the same company after the dividends were received. While 140bp doesn’t seem like a lot, over 11-years this amounts to USD8,043 or 80% of our original investment. The CAGR from this simple after-tax dividend reinvestment strategy would have been 18.9%, or USD67,100. 

Note that these calculated returns include a 100% loss in one of the six stocks I selected. Folli Follie turned out to be cooking the books and its price crashed to virtually zero when the fraud was exposed in 2018. The CAGR return of a five-stock portfolio, without Folli Follie, would have been 20.9%, for a hypothetical total of USD80,600.

Note that in all scenarios, the core portfolio return was much better than US listed Greek ETF, GREK, which is not too far from where it was eleven years ago. Its lethargic performance is mostly due to the abysmal showing of Greek banks, which were a big proportion of the ETF and still are at about 30%.

In retrospect, the best decision I made was not investing in Greek banks. Banks are inherently leveraged and when things go bad at banks, they really go bad. This happened in Greece with the banks going through several recapitalizations. Stock prices of the big four Greek banks fell by over 99% between then and now.


Coulda, shoulda done better While the return of my core portfolio was not bad, it could have been better. The best performing holding, Jumbo, was just the 15th best performing Greek stock over the last eleven years. The best, and one that I was a aware of at the time, was Epsilon Net, a software company whose share price is up nearly 200x in the last eleven years. Another IT company, Quest Holdings, is the second best performing stock in Greece having risen by 45x in the last eleven years. Other tech companies dominate the list of the ten best performing stocks over the last ten years. The growth in technology over the last eleven years did not pass Greece by. Nor did it pass over more savvy investors than myself. 




Contrast to Turkey. As noted in the original blog post the neighboring Turkish market was hitting all time highs when I was in Greece in 2012. I didn’t go there, but suspect the mood in Istanbul was much better than the depressed mood in Athens at the time. I don’t remember anybody recommending Turkish stocks, but I distinctly remember that almost nobody was recommending Greek stocks. However, things go in cycles and this certainly happened in both countries. Over the next eleven years the Turkish market, as measured by their headline BIST100 index fell 28.9%.


Learnings

  • People, Structure, Value. A key takeaway from the trip and this review is that my core investment strategy works.  While this is just one example, I’ve used the same strategy elsewhere and it appears to be effective, with my handpicked portfolios outperforming most comparable headline indexes and ETFs.
  • Choose a good time frame. One reason the portfolio looks good is that Greek stocks have had a good run recently.  The Athens index has been one of the world’s best, rising by 44% so far this year and 58% in the last 12-months alone. If we had done the same exercise one year ago, the portfolio’s dividend reinvested CAGR would have been just 12.9% instead of 18.9%. Holding tight in just the last year added USD33,570 to our hypothetical returns.
  • Hold long and strong.  Psychologically, it would have been hard to hold Greek stocks over the last eleven years. During this time there were numerous protests, government changes, and a tremendous number of articles and news shows about how poor and hopeless the situation in Greece had become. In 2013 a big index provider relegated Greece downward from a developed to an emerging market. Investors had to put up with four years of capital controls which made it near impossible to get money out of Greece (June 2015 to Aug 2019). As can be seen in the charts, after a very nice two-year run, the next seven years were humbling with most stock prices below their recent high water mark.
  • Dividends matter, especially if they’re reinvested. As noted in the text above, dividends reinvested increased the returns. Shares bought with dividends this year, will earn even more dividends next year, and so on, and so on. In the last eleven years after-tax dividends received from Jumbo and OPAP were 171% and 193% of each stock’s respective purchase price.
  • Don’t be a dividend hog. The best return of the six stock portfolio, PPC, did not pay any dividends. This is ironic as typically utilities - such as PPC - are bought for their steady yield. This is what I call a ‘double negative’.  An out of favor sector/stock in and out-of-favor country.  Who would ever want to buy a government owned, non-dividend paying utility in a seemingly bankrupt country going through a financial crisis?? It was amazingly cheap on a 10-year average PE and DY; and was also very inexpensive on a market cap to power supply capacity. Double-negatives don’t always work – they can and do go bankrupt or get delisted – but when they do it can be very sweet.
  • Be cognizant of global trends. Of the top ten performing stocks in Greece in the last eleven years, half were IT or technology related. Globally this has been one of the best performing sectors and so it was in Greece.
  • Don’t buy frauds. Not much to add here. I made decent money on Folli Follie as I sold a year or so before the fraud was exposed. It’s good to be lucky, but this was making money for the wrong reason. I sold for two reasons. First, was the lack of people in their stores. Second, the great John Hempton (see here) thankfully noted that Folli Follie was a fraud as their numbers didn’t add up.
  • Avoid banks. As noted above the stock prices of Greek banks were abysmal over the last 11-years. Please see this Financial Times article which does a much better job than I in explaining why banks are very risky investments (link is here).


15 July 2012 - 15July 2023
(USD)
NameTotal ReturnCAGRAsset Value 15 July 2023 ($10,000 start)
Portfolio With Fees (Without Dividends)360.3%14.9%46,031
Portfolio (Without Dividends)396.2%15.7%49,619
Portfolio (With Dividends)491.3%17.5%59,132
Portfolio (With Dividends Reinvested)571.8%18.9%67,175
Portfolio Excluding Folli Follie (With Dividends Reinvested)706.1%20.9%80,610
S&P 500232.0%11.5%33,200
BIST100 (Turkish Headline Index)-28.9%-3.1%7,110
Greece Hellenic Petroleum
(Now Hellenic Energy Corp.)
166.2%12.1%26,620
Lamda Development371.2%19.4%47,120
Alpha Services & Holdings-95.2%-28.0%477
National Bank of Greece-99.5%-39.3%47
Eurobank Ergasias Services & Holdings-99.8%-45.5%23
Piraeus Financial Holdings-100.0%-60.4%1
CAGRCAGR with dividends reinvestedTotal Dividends Received/ Initial Investment
Jumbo22.0%25.7%171.2%
Public Power Corporation23.4%23.7%3.7%
OPAP13.8%21.2%193.4%
Motor Oil Hellas14.4%18.1%126.3%
Hellenic Exchange7.3%10.7%70.0%
Folli Follie-100.0%-100.0%12.9%


Many thanks to Smith Lee ChengChung (李正中) for crunching the numbers, preparing the visuals and help with additional research. Smith will be a year four student at National Taiwan Normal University this Fall where he’s an English major.

Disclosure: The above is written for entertainment purposes only and should not be relied upon for anything at all, especially financial and investment advice. One should assume the authors have financial interest in one or all of the companies mentioned in this post.


Saturday, March 25, 2017

Contrarian Signals (Or Why Romania May Be the World’s Best Performing Market This Year)

In my research and investing I stress three things: people, structure and value.  I look for companies that are controlled and managed by quality people, have corporate structures that align minority and majority shareholder interests and trade at valuations that are below fair value if not outright cheap.  This post is mostly about valuation and how bankers and financial experts take away the punch bowl just when an investment becomes attractive.  

I've written before how doing the opposite of what large financial institutions are doing and recommending can lead to higher returns (see here). This post is in the same vein
The reason I think Romania has a good chance of being one of, if not the best, performing stock markets this year is that the broker I use to access Eastern European stocks informed me that it will stop service there.  Earlier this year I had to transfer or sell all my Romanian shares.  To me, my broker’s closing operations is a large buy signal. 
The broker is ultimately owned by a large Belgian bank.  It’s likely that back in their corporate headquarters the stuffy-suited managers decided that all group companies would stop offering their clients access to Romanian equities.
This could likely be a very logical decision as it sounds like they have few clients trading Romania equities. My Prague-based account manager noted that I was one of four.
However, it is also short-sighted as there are many positives.  Romania has one of Europe’s fastest growing economies at 4.6% last year.  The country appears to be serious about political reform.   Its stock market is also one of the world’s better performing ones, having increased by close to 16% year-to-date. Despite the increase, many of its large cap stocks pay good dividends with yields north of 6%. 
While logical, it still stinks.  It took a long time to find a broker who provided access to most Eastern European markets and took US citizens as clients.  Part of the onboarding process was flying to the Czech Republic to sign account opening forms in person. (It was actually not much of a burden - Prague in June is actually quite nice.  But I’m still angry about it).
The situation reminds me of other instances where bank and financial product withdrawals and shutdowns turned into good contrarian signals. History doesn’t repeat, but it can rhyme, to paraphrase a famous quote. 
Consider the following:
  • Brazil – the EGShares Brazil Infrastructure ETF (BRXX) was closed and delisted at the end of October 2015.  At the time headline news in Brazil was pretty abysmal.  However Brazilian equities were starting to flash buy signals based on my screens.  Stocks in the BRXX were the least expensive among the handful of Brazilian ETFs.  Since its delisting, its top ten holdings have increased by an average of 64% in USD.  Many had good dividend yields which would have likely pushed total returns closer to 70%.  Not as good as the Bovespa’s 84% during the same time period, but not too shabby. (ETFs are like mutual funds that track a specific index or strategy and can be bought and sold like stocks.  More information is can be found here).
  • Greece - in 2012 HSBC sold its Greek securities business.  This was at the same time that I wanted to buy Greek shares, as they were trading at valuations similar to Korean stocks at the depths of the 1997/98 Asian financial crisis.  The bank that I’ve had an account with for almost 30 years took away a service just when I wanted to use it.  Over the next two years the headline Athex index rose by close to 200%.
  • Russia – in mid-December 2014 when the Ruble was floated and Russian securities and its currency plummeted, my European broker decided to suspend dealing in Moscow listed shares.  I was locked-out just when I wanted to buy.  Many share prices of quality companies I earmarked to buy are since up 2-3 times in USD.
  • South-East Asia – around 2001 HSBC closed and/or vastly curtailed its research operations in South-East Asia.  It was during this time that many of those markets started a multi-year bull run.  Since then, Indonesia’s and Thailand’s headline indexes are up by over 12x and 5x respectively in USD.
To be honest I really don’t know if Romania will do well this year.  Nobody does.  As I wrote in a previous post, the country’s stocks seem to be perennially cheap (see here).  Like all articles on investments, consider this article as an idea and interesting information, rather than advice. 
In addition to Romania, other Eastern European stock markets look attractive with several among the world’s best performing so far this year.  Czech stocks are some of the world’s least expensive. Polish stocks seem to be rebounding from political uncertainty since Poland’s late 2015 change in government.  And there’s even life in Ukrainian stocks as that country’s economy starts to stabilize.  Its GDP grew by 2.3% in 2016, rebounding from a 15% decline in the previous two-years. 
Index% Change Year-To-Date
(USD)
RomaniaBET14.7
PolandWIG19.4
Czech RepublicPX8.7
UkraineUX17.5

Bankers and their management are not known as visionaries.  They are known to stop lending and pull products when the market or economy is faltering and their clients need them the most.  This has happened before and it will happen again.  To me these are good, qualitative contrarian signals that are not easily programmable by the quants and algos.  Let’s call it ‘qualitative alpha’ or, my favorite, ‘Research Alpha’ (see here).

It doesn't look like I'll be part of the Romanian party unfortunately, but I hope there are some readers who can make some decent money on this.  Buy me a bottle of wine if you do. One from Transylvania will do nicely.



Sunday, November 22, 2015

BRICs, PITs, and PIGS: Go Ugly

In my research and investing I stress three things: people, structure and value.  I look for companies that are controlled and managed by quality people, have corporate structures that align minority and majority shareholder interests and trade at valuations that are below fair value if not outright cheap. 

This blog is mostly about valuation and yet another example of how investing in beaten down, unpopular and ugly markets can lead to better returns. 

Usually valuations are low in markets that are not very attractive.   But who knows when the news can get even worse? Uncertainty and negative news flow keep most of us out of markets just when we should be buying. 

And it can take even greater will power to stay invested when nobody around you sees your point of view, friends and peers are calling you crazy, and well-educated, respected and slick investment bank analysts and traders are negative.    

It is psychologically easier to invest in markets when there is a lot of good news and the future looks very bright.  The problem is that these markets tend to be expensive and future returns tend not to be as good.

To contrast these two points let’s look at two acronyms that surfaced about the same time.

BRIC stands for Brazil, Russia, India and China. The acronym is attributed to Jim O’Neill in a paper he wrote for Goldman Sachs in November 2001 (found here).  In it he argued that these four countries should be included in high-level government groupings such as the “G7” because their size and growth would make them increasingly influential.

The acronym came out not long after the tech crash. Wall Street was ripe for a new story and over the next few years the term became more popular.  Goldman Sachs and many others launched BRIC funds and ETFs.  There are now over 200 of them according to a very expensive database.

The term took on a life of its own.  Leaders of the four appear to like the grouping.  Just a few months ago they and South Africa formally launched the BRICS Development Bank (link here).

About the same time BRICs was coined, traders and analysts who survived the late 1990s Asian financial crisis were referring to the ASEAN countries as PITs.  The term stood for Philippines, Indonesia and Thailand.  These were three of the hardest hit economies and markets.  Unlike BRICs I don’t think anybody has come forward to claim responsibility for it.  Calling your home market a degrading term soon after clients lost money would not likely make one popular.

Investing in the four BRIC countries when the phrase was coined until now would have generated decent returns.  The four countries' headline indexes are up an average of 302% since late 2001 for a CAGR of 10.5% (this and other return figures in this article are based on the average return of each country's headline index, in USD, dividends not included). 

In contrast, and despite the acronym’s negative connotation, one would have done considerably better by investing in the three PITs markets.  An equally weighted investment in the three grew by 675% over the same time period, which means the PITs investor would have made more than double the money of the BRIC investor.  Even the worst PIT outperformed the best BRIC.  Thailand, the worst performing PITs country, rose by 629%, a bit more than India, the best performing BRIC country, which increased by 611% from November 2001 to November 2015. 

In addition to being weary of investment fads, investors should also be skeptical of what the big banks are pushing. In July 2006 Goldman Sachs launched its BRIC fund.  From launch to close, the fund’s performance was just under 20%.  Over the same time period the three PITs indexes increased on average by 157%, meaning that one would have made almost eight times more money by investing in the markets that were unloved rather than the ones that the big banks were marketing.


Are PIGS Today’s PITs?

PIGS stands for Portugal, Italy, Greece, and Spain.  These are some the world’s worst performing economies and equity markets since the 2008 global financial crisis.  Like PITs it is not a flattering grouping and member countries have reportedly renounced the term (link here).

I suspect PIGS could be an up-to-date version of PITs.  The origins of both are the same and they describe markets that are having problems and are out of favor.  

Also like PITs the countries in the grouping are geographically close and have a lot in common in terms of economic integration, language, and culture. This is a stronger grouping than the BRICs. Except for the large country size, I don’t really see much that binds them like the PITs and PIGS.


Back to BRICs

Ironically now may be a good time to consider investing in BRIC equities. 

Russia has some of the world’s least expensive large companies and very impressive management.  Brazil is starting to look interesting with its currency down some 40% in the last two years.  There are some exciting and inexpensive companies in China and at 7x PE the Hang Seng China Enterprise Index does not seem very expensive. Weren’t US equities trading at the same level in the early 1980s just before that market’s long bull run?

There’s also a good contrarian signal.  Goldman Sachs recently closed the above mentioned BRIC fund.  Big banks have a habit of closing operations and products just when things start turning around. HSBC closed its South East Asian equity research offices in 2001 – just before those markets went on a multi-year bull run. Goldman’s closing of its BRIC’s fund may be a similar signal (more here). 


Go Ugly

This short piece is meant to show that going against the grain and doing what is uncomfortable and unconventional many times leads to higher returns.  The best place to find value is typically in ugly geographies and sectors.   

Are there other places that appear to be ugly and warrant catchy phrases such as PIGS?

How about “RUKs”, for Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan, three ex-Soviet countries whose currencies have fallen and have some of the highest interest rates in the world.   Or “PCB”, for Peru, Columbia and Brazil, three of the worst performing equity markets this year for US-dollar investors  Or “JOBQES”, for Jordan, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, Egypt and Saudi Arabia which are among the world’s least expensive equity markets likely due Middle East uncertainty.  Or "GETOUt" for gold, energy, telcos, oil and utilities, five out-of-favor sectors that dominate my global value screens.

----------------------------

Making Ugly Fun

"Average investors are fortunate if they can avoid pitfalls, whereas superior investors look to take advantage of them", wrote Howard Marks in his very good book, The Most Important Thing.

Psychologically it is hard to put one's hard-earned money into unattractive and out-of-favor stocks and markets.   It's not easy or very enjoyable to try and catch a falling knife.  But buying quality companies at knock-down prices is likely a good way to limit downside and hopefully generate superior long-term returns. 

To help ease the way, I silently sing the chorus of a song from my youth.  Perhaps it will help you also.  It's sexist, corny and elementary, but with a catchy pop-hook its also very memorable, so make sure to click on the link below.  I've changed some lyrics in the second version to make it a little more investment specific.  

If you want to be happy for the rest of your life,
Never make a pretty woman your wife,
So from my personal point of view,
Get an ugly girl to marry you.

-----------------------


If you want to be happy for the rest of your time,
Never make a pretty stock your life,
So from my personal point of view,
Get an ugly market to carry you.

"If You Want to Be Happy", by Jimmy Soul (link here), 
(Based on "Ugly Woman", by Roaring Lion (link here)