Showing posts with label Soeryadjaya. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Soeryadjaya. Show all posts

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Astra and Sinar Mas - 22-Year Performance Comparison


In the early 1990’s I wrote two reports on Indonesian business groups. They were updated in 1997 and 2007.

The reports are deep-dives into Indonesia’s largest conglomerates.   In Asia and most of world outside of the US and the UK, conglomerates are many times referred to as business groups; and designate a grouping of companies controlled by a family or other entity.

The reports examined not only companies that were listed on the stock exchange, but also looked at unlisted companies.  It looked at the key people making decisions at the group rather than company level. The reports dug into the controlling shareholder and his/her extended family, their reputation, and relationships with the government and other business groups. 

While writing and editing the report I and my colleagues would discuss who was good and bad and try to rank the groups by whom we would trust with our own money and which we would recommend to our clients. 

It was a pure subjective process.  The report was qualitative and had no valuations data, projections, or other numbers except for market cap and company ownership.  The reports themselves were more a collection of facts. Some comments were put into the text, but it was mostly factual information.  

My [1] conclusion was that there was a big divergence in the quality of controlling shareholders and that there was a wide variety of corporate structures.

Specifically we thought that the Astra International group stood out as likely being the best or one of the best, corporate citizens in Indonesia    In contrast was the Sinar Mas group came out on the other side of the spectrum.  We did not like them very much at all.  

Astra

Astra was the second largest business group in Indonesia by turnover in 1991.  In August 1991 its three listed companies accounted for 11.8% of the JSE’s market capitalization, the second largest after the Salim Group.  It had five major business lines automobiles, heavy equipment, electronics, wood based industry, and agribusiness.  A family related group called Summa, had interests in financial services, real estate and construction.   We included Summa in the report on Astra as we defined a group as companies controlled by the same family. 

Astra was founded by William Soeryadjaya in 1957. It started as a trading company working with the Sukarno government, where it imported asphalt, construction and road materials.  It is believed that Astra’s early success was due to its close connection with Ibnu Sutowo, the ex-chief of Pertamina, Indonesia’s national oil company; and perhaps IR. Suhartoyo who headed the country’s Department of Industry in the 1970s. Astra survived the downfall of both and by the mid-1970s was able to survive on its own. 

The group later expanded into property and construction, automobile assembly, heavy engineering and plantations. Several of its largest and most lucrative businesses were partnerships with Japanese companies.  The two biggest and most successful were its relationship with Toyota and Komatsu. 

At the time Astra stood out as the only Indonesian conglomerate that had established a professional management structure.  In the 1991 report I wrote, “We consider Astra to be the most ‘corporate’ group amongst all Indonesian conglomerates.  While many Indonesian conglomerates are beginning to professionalize operations, Astra has already done so.”

It was not totally professional as there were family members in leadership positions.  The founder’s brother Benyamin was a commissioner in several more important Astra subsidiaries.  Second son Edwin handled the daily activities of the group, played a role in taking Astra public, and was seen as the group’s next leader. 

Astra went a step further in hiring and giving managerial and decision-making responsibilities to both non- Chinese Indonesians as well as ethnic Chinese-Indonesians.  This was very rare at the time.  Virtually all big businesses in Indonesia at the time were controlled by Indonesian Chinese and non-family employees were typically in the same Chinese dialect group.  They were usually hired more for loyalty than competency.

Astra’s founding family also had a good reputation in Jakarta business circle.  They were considered ‘peranakan’ Indonesian Chinese.  Peranakan refers to South-East Asian ethnic-Chinese that had largely adapted the language and customs of their adapted countries.  

The group also had a good reputation amongst other investors as well as solid minority shareholder.   I wrote, “It is well respected in Indonesia and abroad.  As an example of this, the International Finance Corporation (IFC) has taken a 5.38% equity stake in the listed company and an IFC official sits on the board of PT Astra Inernational”. 

 Like many successful business groups in emerging markets, one of Astra’s key strengths was its being seen as a reliable joint venture partner.   In 1991 I wrote: “Astra has been known by foreigners as a reliable and efficient joint venture partner.  The reputation proved appealing to Toyota, which formed a joint venture, which continues to this day.  The relationship with foreigners, especially Japanese, has given Astra access to more capital than it could raise in Indonesia.” 

The group also had a fairly clean structure with a good alignment between minority and controlling shareholders.   Most of the family’s businesses were under the listed holding company, PT Astra International.    

The listcos however were not in complete alignment with the Soeryadjayas’ family interests.   Founder William Soeryadjaya financed his eldest son Edward’s Summa Group. But at the time they seemed to be operated separately. Summa was Edward’s vehicle and Astra would become younger brother’s vehicle.  I wrote in 1991 that ‘…we believe the two groups are acting independently.  William is believed to be more of a risk-taker than his father or brother Edwin.”[2][3]   

I also wrote in 1991 that the Soeryadjayas agribusiness interests were both within and outside of the listed holding company.  This was another potential conflict between family and corporate resources and attention.  

Despite these two items, Astra had very clean and minority friendly structure compared to the other groups we looked.


Sinar Mas

Sinar Mas was the third largest business group in Indonesia by turnover in 1991.  In August 1991 its four listed companies accounted for 9.6% of the JSE’s market capitalization, the third largest after the Astra and Salim Groups. 

Like Astra, it was controlled by one family; the Widjajas, whose head Eka Tjipta Widjaja was believed to have close relations to the Indonesian military.  I worte, “During the Indonesian revolution, Eka developed a relationship with the Indonesian military by supplying tea, syrup, dried meat and other necessities to the Indonesian forces.  Eka used empty army boats to transport copra around the archipelago and later to Europe.  By the end of the revolution, Eka had plantations producing coffee and rubber.”

Sinar Mas’ more formal origins were typically traced to its 1969 founding of Bimoli.  By the mid-1990s Bimoli was Indonesia’s largest cooking oil brand with an estimated 50% market share. 

Sinar Mas had eight major business lines: banking, finance and insurance; pulp and paper; real estate and property; plantations; food and consumer products; hotels and resorts; and chemicals. 

Unlike Astra, Sinar Mas did not group its varied businesses into one listed holding company.  The group’s structure and vertical integration strategy left open the possibility of transfer pricing between public and privately controlled entities.

Two Sinar Mas listed companies - Indah Kiat and Tjiwi Kimia - were both in the pulp and paper business. “Together they formed the largest fully-integrated pulp and paper manufacturing operations in Asia outside Japan”.   These two were primarily manufacturing companies.  Other companies in the group supplied raw materials and sold finished products. This left open the possibility of buying and selling products to-and-from listed companies also controlled by the Widjaja family. “The group has its own distribution companies to support its paper manufacturers and a 200,000 hectare forest concession in North Sumatra.  Other companies produce finished paper products such as notebooks and other office supplies.”

Further, the family-controlled bank meant that the group could obtain easy funding.  This likely led to poor capital allocation.  In the early 1990s, Indonesian banks were allowed to lend up to 20% of their loan book to related companies.  After BII’s downfall in the Asian Financial Crisis it was revealed that 50% of its loans were to Sinar Mas group companies. 

I did not include it in the 1991 report, but it was an open secret that In addition to his many diverse businesses, Sinar Mas’ founder, Eka Tjipta Widjaja, had a very busy family life.  He reportedly had seven wives and some 30 children. 

I did however write that many of his children from his first marriage were working and leading group companies.   In 1991 one of his daughters, Sukmawati Widjaja, was group CEO and Vice Chairman.  Not much was known about her except that her late husband, Ruby Maeloa was responsible for much of Sinar Mas’ growth in the 1970 and 1980s.   

Eka was considered ‘totok’ Chinese.  This refers to Indonesian Chinese born in China (or their Indonesian born children) who use a Chinese dialect as their primary language and do not identify themselves as Indonesians.  In 1991 I wrote, “He is a totok Chinese and seems quite traditional in his life-style.  His Indonesian has a heavy Ujung Pandang accent and he conducts meetings in Chinese when possible.  It is believed that he prefers to conduct meetings in Chinese or the Ujung Padang dialect”.

We were also told, but did not write, that outside the Widjaja family and a few trusted lieutenants, very few managers in the group had any significant decision making responsibility.   This fit the custom as previously described.

At the time there were also several rumors that Sinar Mas’ pulp, paper, plantation and /or forestry operations were breaking environmental laws.   


Quality Pays

Performance Since 1991

So how would minority investors have done by investing in Astra and Sinar Mas group companies since the September 1991 report?

I always suspected that Astra-listed companies outperformed Sinar Mas ones, but I was surprised by the extent.  In fact the divergence in performance is stunning. 

From the time of publication to now, all three Astra listed companies had positive total returns (i.e. price appreciation and dividend yield).   Astra International’s total return has been 9.5x in USD.  This includes the 1997/98 massive Rupiah depreciation.[4]   United Tractors has done better.  Inventors have been rewarded with 12.4x their money in the same 22 years.

During the same time period all three listed Sinar Mas companies have lost money for anybody that has kept shares for that long.  After 22 years a USD investor in the group’s largest listed company, Indah Kiat, has lost 56% of their investment. 



Performance Since 1998 (height of Asian financial crisis)

The performance since  August 1991 does not take into account market conditions.  It just happened to be when the report was published.  

What about a lucky investor who bought Astra International at the depths of the Asian Financial Crisis and had the fortitude to hold until now?

Astra International hit an all time low during the week of 9 October 1998.  Since then a USD investor would have been rewarded with a return of 207x (or 20,714.5%).  An investment in United Tractors would have done even better returning 1,172x (117,160.0%) over those same 15 years.

The return from the Sinar Mas listed companies was much lower since 1998.  The best was from Tjiwi Kimia.  It returned 72%. A holder of Indah Kiat shares would have lost money.



2002 to Now




I cheated a bit in the above analysis.  I selected a time period when Indonesian domestic oriented stocks were facing a very bleak future, and Astra’s share price was at an all-time low.   


In contrast exporters – such as Indah Kiat and Tjiwi Kimia - stood to benefit from the declining Rupiah. 

Both companies share price performed well during the Asian financial crisis.  For instance, between its December 1997 through and its May 1999 peak Indah Kiat shares price rose by 3.2x.[5] hitting a peak price of rp4,425.  It is now trading at Rp1,230 down 72% in 14 years.
But how would have investor done if we used the same criteria to select the date as we did for Astra?   How would an investor have done if they got into Sinar Mas’ largest listed company at its historic low, and would this have been better than buying shares of the quality group companies? 

Even here Astra vastly outperformed.  Between May 2002 and August 2013 Indah Kiat’s total return was 79.1%.  Astra International’s was more than 12x.   In fact, Astra group companies outperformed by a factor of 6x to 34x, depending on how one pairs the group’s six listed.



Moving On

There are more items to explore.  The comparison is hardly apples-to-apples as the industries that the listed Astra companies are involved in are very different than from the listed Sinar Mas ones.  Besides there are likely additional time periods when Sinar Mas group company shares outperformed Astra company shares.

There is also the sleep-at-night factor.  This is basically how much one worries about their investments.  Since 1991 investors would have lost a lot of sleep with any Indonesian investment, especially during the Asian financial crisis.

But I suspected one would have lost much more sleep if they had held any of the three listed Sinar Mas companies:
  • Both Indah Kiat and Tjiwi Kimia’s shares appear to have been suspended in 1991. 
  • Their parent company, Asia Pulp and Paper (APP) was behind the largest corporate default in history before Worldcom.  It defaulted on some US$12-14bn. 
  • APP’s NYSE shares fell some 98% from its IPO price and were later delisted. 
  • APP and other Sinar Mas companies have been the subject of numerous environmental group criticism.  

Last Thoughts

I’ve been researching business groups off and on since my first Indonesian group report was published 1990.  In the past it has always been a labor of love.  After finishing each one I’ve felt very powerful.  I know who controls what; understand how minority investor interests may be compromised; and have fact-based opinions on which controlling shareholders are good and bad for outside investors. 

What I particularly like about this research is that I look at data points, ask questions and root-out information that others bypass.  This helps me to generate non-consensus investment ideas.  It gives me the courage to buy companies when others are selling and valuations are attractive.

To try to explain this I wrote a short piece where I dubbed my research methodology Research Alpha.  My "Research Alpha" focuses on people, structure and valuation. This is in contrast to bank research that tries to forecast earnings and take a myopic view of a company.   I call this Research Beta (write-up on this is here). 

I used this "Research Alpha" methodology during a personal trip to Greece (write-up is here), in several investments in Asia, and when interviewing hedge fund managers when I was a fund-of-funds professional. 





[1] Much of this blog refers to “A Guide to Indonesian Business Groups”, published in September 1991 by Crosby Research.   Michael McGaughy researched and wrote most of the materials. John Niepold and Alex Wreksoremboko, who were also working at Crosby Research in Indonesia, contributed to the report.   Richard Borsuk, then Asian Wall Street Journal’s chief Indonesian reporter edited and provided feedback on the report. As per company policy at the time, none were credited for their work and no author name(s) appear on the report. 

[2]  A year after the 1991 edition of “A Guide to Indonesian Business Groups” was published, William Soerydjaya lost control of Astra.  He sold the family’s controlling stake in order to rescue his eldest son’s Summa Bank, which had suffered from a credit crisis and finally collapsed.  William Soerydjaya personally guaranteed all Summa Bank deposits using his stake in Astra.  All depositors received their money back with interest, without using any government or outside support. 

[3] After Astra, Edwin Soeryadjaya founded Saratoga Inestama Sedaya, which has sizeable stakes in JSE listed Adaro Energy and Tower Bersama Infrastructure.   Edwin regularly appears on the Indonesian Forbes rich list.

[4] The 1991 report listed the Rupiah at Rp1,951 to US$1. When this was blog was written in mid-August 2013, the exchange rate was Rp10,309 to US$1. 



Monday, May 27, 2013

Navigating the Investment Landscape in Asia and Beyond: Manual of Ideas Interview

I was interviewed in early May 2013 by John Mihaljevic, the Managing Editor, The Manual of Ideas.   Please click here for the splash page and access to the taped interview: Navigating the Investment Landscape in Asia and Beyond

The cut-and-pasted introduction page below.




=========================

Navigating the Investment Landscape in Asia and Beyond


Print Friendly
asia investment landscapeInvesting in the local markets of Asia can seem like a daunting task for investors based in North America or Europe. Asian markets have proved quite treacherous at times, including due to economic volatility, corporate governance, accounting, and other concerns. While some Western investors have given up on investing in Asia or have relegated their Asian investments to ADRs or ADSs, others have continued to prosper in Asian local markets.
How can you improve your analysis of Asian investment candidates? That is one of the questions I sought to answer in my conversation with Asian equity research expert Michael McGaughy. Mike is the sole-owner of Kaiko Limited, a Hong Kong-based independent consultancy. The firm provides research, manager selection, and due diligence to institutions and family offices. Mike was previously a managing director at StoneWater Capital, a New York based fund-of-funds that specializes in allocating capital to Asian managers.
Mike has developed a number of unique insights into investing in Asia as a result of his long experience on the ground. He stresses the importance of understanding who the ultimate owners are of publicly traded entities, as incentives play a large role in driving long-term investment returns. He also differentiates between “research alpha” and “research beta”. According to Mike, research alpha covers what is not included in consensus earnings forecasts, while research beta is what most analysts focus on and what constitutes the basis for consensus earning forecasts.
In the conversation below, Mike McGaughy refers to the following companies and people:
  • China/HK: Fosun International (HK:0656), Focus Media, Guo Guangchang; Folli Follie
  • Indonesia: Sinar Mas Group, UIC, Widjaja Family, Eka Tjipta Widjaja, Asia Pulp and Paper (APP), Astra International, Astra Group, Soeryadjaya family
  • Malaysia: Khazanah Nasional Berhad, Petronas, Permodalan Nasional Berhad
  • Greece: Folli Follie, OPAP, Latsis family
Feel free to leave your comments here or contact Mike on LinkedIn.



Monday, April 15, 2013

Cut Out the Middle. People = Equity


I am still searching for ways to best explain the philosophy behind my ‘group’ research and why it is important.  My research starts with looking at the background and history of the controlling shareholders, as well as all the companies he/she/it controls.  I do as much research on the listed and unlisted companies and spend as much time on the non-core businesses as the core businesses.

There are likely many different ways to explain what I do depending on the listener’s background. 

My last post was written for financial professionals.  In that article I introduced two expressions – “research beta” and “research alpha”.  I contrasted the type of research used to generate consensus earnings forecasts – ”research beta” – with the more background, people and structure focused research that I emphasize – “research alpha’ (See: http://michaelmcgaughy.blogspot.hk/2013/04/research-alpha-and-research-beta.html). 

After posting this, I thought of another, non-investment-jargon way of explaining the philosophy behind what I do. Here goes….

Firstly, it has been written many times before that business is about people.  The equation can be written: "people = business". 

Secondly, equity represents an investment in a business.   By definition equity represents a legal claim on a business.  It represents the difference between assets and liabilities of that business.  The equation can be written: "business = equity". 

Cut ‘business’ out of the middle and we are left with a direct link between people and equity.   Or rewritten: "people = equity".  Equity is about investing in people.

From this simple equation it becomes clear that equity investors should evaluate the people behind the business’ they own.  However this is rarely done for listed companies.  When was the last time you’ve seen a research report with an objective or even critical assessment of the key family, people or entity that controls a listed company?

Visiting and meeting management is different than objectively evaluating their background and history.  It is a good information point, but a meeting or two does not replace looking at someone’s past actions and background.  Bernie Ebbers (Worldcom) and Eka Tjipta Widjaja (Asia Pulp and Paper) likely charmed the socks off many corporate and investment bankers while building their companies.  At the end of the day they were behind two of the largest corporate defaults before the 2008 meltdown.  

I would also argue that people are more important in emerging markets where the legal system, regulatory agencies, and business infrastructure is not as entrenched as in more developed countries.  

In my experience more emphasis and attention is placed on people in South East Asia, the Indian-subcontinent, and greater China than in the West. In most developed Western countries the emphasis is comparatively more focused on institutions and rules.

Another reason as to why people are more relatively more important in Asian and emerging markets is that many of the largest listed companies are relatively young; they are typically majority owned by their founders and their descendants, and are tightly controlled by the founding family.   Think of Li-Ka Shing and his Cheung Kong group, the Lim family’s Genting group, or Guo Guangcheng’s Fosun International group. 

Luckily there is a lot of publicly available information about most ‘tycoons’.  In many Asian countries wealthy tycoons get as much press coverage as rock and movie stars do in the US and Europe.

There is also a wealth of publicly available data as reporting requirements have increased in most Asian and other markets in the last three decades.  Insider buy-and-sell data can be important trading signals.  Related party transactions provide a window into the tycoons’ non-listed businesses.

Even in the West individuals are important.  Think about Steve Jobs and Apple.  His history as an innovator, businessman and marketing guru were well known when he returned to Apple in 1996.  Betting on him and his background turned out to be of the better investments of all time with Apple's share price increasing from its 1996 range of US$4.50 - US$8.50, to over US$700 in 2012.

People also impart their culture and values on the companies they lead. This can be especially true of the founders.  This initial corporate culture can take a life of its own with older employees reinforcing existing culture and corporate history to newer ones; or only hiring new employees that fit-in. One of my favorite examples is Astra International, which was started by the very honorable Soeradjaya family.  It remains one of the best-managed companies in Indonesia despite the founders having sold their stake over 15 years ago.

Research also bears this out.  I forget the exact reports I read, and I may be rusty on the numbers, however I remember several stating that share prices decline by something like 50% on average within five years of the founder’s death.  (Apple shareholders take note?)

People are important in every occupation, but especially in business.  Decisions have to be made and people are behind each and every one of these decisions.  Understanding the business from the controlling owners' perspective is something that is overlooked by many analysts and should be emphasized more.




Thursday, January 26, 2012

Chinese New Year, Cheap Stocks, Conglomerates - Indonesia's Sinar Mas - sent on 26 Jan 2012


Chinese New Year
Dragons “…(are) is bold and flamboyant, and in 2012 few will remain untouched by its influence.  This is no ordinary year and no ordinary time”; “Dragon years are action driven and times for major initiatives”;   “Whatever your plans, this is the time to move forward”, Neil Sommerville, Your Chinese Horoscope 2012. 

First of all please let me wish you and yours a very happy and prosperous Year of the Dragon; 恭喜发财; 新年快乐!!  It began on Monday 23 Jan 2012 and will continue to 9 Feb 2013 

Chinese (at least those that believe in Chinese zodiacs) consider the Dragon year a time for good fortune and favorable for starting new long term endeavors such as a business, marriage, or family.  Local press and brokers are expecting the number of births to increase, with one source putting this at 5% in China as compared to last year.  Marriages are also expected to increase with a local broker suggesting that these will cause gold demand to increase.

In Hong Kong, the city is slowly coming back to life after the two-day weekend and three-day holiday, which ended on Wednesday.  The holidays here were cold and miserable which I hope is not some sort of sign for Asian markets this year. 

The attached photos are of a store in downtown Taipei selling Chinese New Year decorations.  I was there in mid-January and hope write and send a trip note later.




Inexpensive Small and Mid-Caps

A broker’s note and a chance meeting with a newish small- and mid-cap manager reminded me of the deep-value opportunities available in Hong Kong and China. The small cap manager – despite being down a lot in 2011 when small and mid-caps did poorly – was very upbeat when talking about valuations.

He has a good point.  As an example, I’ve attached a research note from local broker OSK on Fujikon Industrial, which was trading below cash and at a 10% trailing yield when the note was written. I’ve never heard of Fujikon, so by all means do not take this as an endorsement of the company or stock’s investment merits, but thought of it as a good example of the type of value one can find in today’s market.





Conglomerates – Indonesia’s Sinar Mas

The article below worries me. It is from last week’s FinanceAsia email – a free daily that can be subscribed to atwww.financeasia.com
The reason it disturbs me is that it does not mention that the Sinar Mas group was behind Asia Pulp and Paper, one of the biggest bond defaults in Asia (for a quick summary this seems as good as any -http://stocktaleslot.blogspot.com/2005/11/asia-pulp-paper-debt-default.html).

Ever since my first report on Indonesian conglomerates in 1991, I did not like Sinar Mas and its controlling family, the Widjajas. In fact the family’s adverse transfer pricing to the detriment of minority shareholders prompted my initial interest in researching Asia’s business groups. My key mistake back then was not being as vocal as I should have of my dislike of the group.

I bring this up because from time-to-time I get asked why I look at business groups instead of just sticking to the listed entity. Sinar Mas provides a good example.
I wrote the below a few months ago, but thought the announcement of a Sinar Mas entity looking for funding provided an opportune time to kill two birds with one stone.  Firstly, it provides an example of how Asia works and what to look out for.  Secondly, it provides a warning to investors on the group and its background.

I’ve been told the group has reformed with the founder now frail and his sons each taking over different parts of the business.  Despite this, I would continue to stay clear give the group’s history and poor reputation.


--
History Helps

” We must study the present in light of the past for the purposes of the future.”  John Maynard Keynes

One thing that cannot be replaced is a company’s history and background. While one cannot invest in the past, one can learn from it.  However very few in the increasingly short-term oriented financial industry have the time to really get to know the background and in and outs of the companies they invest in.  Even fewer will take a look at the controlling shareholders.

In “Build to Last” a book by Jim Collins and Jerry Porras, the two authors note that a key trait of long-term successful companies are their history and the values and culture embodied in their history.  Essentially getting off on the right foot, can have huge implications for a business in the long-term.  In the west Coca-cola (125 years old in 2011) is an example.  (FT, Morgen Witzel, 15 July, History Classes that Offer Management lessons for the present and future).

This is particularly true of the major or majority shareholders that typically control the larger listed companies in Asia, ASEAN included.   The family behind Astra International had a well-deserved good reputation in Indonesian business circles in the early nineties when I was covering it.  It continues to have a good reputation despite having different controlling shareholders since the founding Soeryadjaya ‘s sold it to cover other family debts. 

In 1991 when I wrote my first report on Asian business groups for the old Crosby Group I did it for two reasons. One was because the same names kept appearing on prospectuses, annual reports, and financial publications. Secondly, at the time there was little to no organized information on Indonesian companies on Bloomberg and other data providers and no consensus forecasts that may have served as an anchor.   Related party transactions between group and listed companies prompted my interest to find out what else the controlling shareholder owned.

My anchor instead was to focus on who owned, and controlled what, and what were the ramifications for minority investors.  I had to write a lot of this down as Indonesia was new to me, and I really did not know who-was-who and what-was-what.  Further, Indonesian Chinese businessman used different names including their Indonesian name, and different English translations of their Chinese names depending on which dialect they used and when they were translated.  In short it was very confusing, so I had to write it all down and try to connect the dots. 

One key thing I remember was that I thought Sinar Mas’ controlling family the Widjaja’s, were not up to snuff.  The group’s patriarch Eka Widjaja, had many of wives, was shifting money from a listed chemical company (UIC) to his private companies.  Further, I kept hearing rumors amongst the Indonesian business community that ethnic Chinese businessmen from Medan were not to be trusted (Eka’s family is from there), and that the Sinar Mas group was rumored to not be on the up-and-up.   I was repeatedly told that it is the sort of Indonesian Chinese family that has little regard for Indonesia, its environment, its people, etc.

Despite being at the time the second largest business group in Indonesian after the Salims, one of the key take-aways from that first report was that the Widjajas are not someone I would trust and that I would not want my fund manager to take anything more than a day trade in their listed companies’ stock.

By 1992 I was no longer covering Indonesian equities, having shifted to research and development of the Crosby Group’s business in the Indian subcontinent, and later moved into Mainland China private equity.

Fast forward to 1998 and headlines about Asia Pulp and Paper, the largest corporate default to date.   And who was behind it – the Widjaja’s.  When I learned of the amount of bond and loan defaults I was truly amazed.  The bankers and investors must have heard the same rumors I had, and either chose to ignore them, or perhaps they mistook size for quality.

But perhaps the new-kids-on-the-block bankers did not do their homework on Sinar Mas and the Widjajas.  There is no shortage of fresh meat in the capital markets; youngish analysts are keen to make a name for themselves; and just out of school bankers are itching to use their family and alumni network to strike a deal.   On the buy-side, trainee fund managers do not know or have the time to spend looking into the background of the majority shareholders as their Asian posting may be a 2-3 year step on the career ladder.

Best Regards,
Mike




AsiaFinance article is here:
  
Sinar Mas in pre-marketing for potential $300 million share sale

The insurer is the second Indonesian company this year after Petrosea to test the water for a follow-on issue.
By Aiko Hayashi | 20 January 2012



Pre-marketing is underway for a potential share sale in Indonesian insurer Sinar Mas Multiartha which is attracting some interest from international investors, sources say, although investor activities have been generally slow ahead of the Lunar New Year holidays. Sinar Mas Multiartha is the finance arm of Sinar Mas Group. Aside from insurance it is also active in banking, multi-finance, leasing and information technology among other things.
Although no offering has been formally announced, one source said the company has permission to issue up to 10% of its existing capital in the form of new shares, while its major shareholder has said that it is also considering a potential sale. Based on the current share price, a 10% sale would translate into about $300 million, but that would likely be the top end as most follow-ons tend to get done at a discount, one source said.
Sinar Mar Multiartha listed on the predecessor to the Indonesian Stock Exchange in 1995 and has a current market capitalisation of about $3.1 billion. However, trading volumes are thin and investors are supposedly only willing to look at the deal at a discount to the current trading price.
The bookrunners of the deal, Deutsche Bank and UBS, estimate Sinar Mas Multiartha’s fair market value at around $1.3 billion to $1.6 billion and about $2 billion, respectively. This suggests that a sale of 10% to 20% worth of shares (including existing shares by the major shareholder) will translate into about $200 million to $400 million, although the offering size has yet to been determined, another source said.
The main owner behind Sinar Mas is the Widjaja family. It owns a number of companies, but the main vehicle is JBC International Finance (MAU), which holds a 52.53% stake in the insurance company, according to Indonesian Stock Exchange data. Another 8.45% is owned by Sinarmas Sekuritas.
The Sinar Mas move comes after bankers started pre-marketing last week for a potential follow-on share sale by Indonesian contract mining and equipment rental company Petrosea. The pre-marketing was scheduled to end yesterday and the company is expected to launch an offering of about $100 million after the lunar new year holidays. Macquarie and UBS are joint bookrunners.
Sinar Mas’s share offering will be open to investors in Asia, Europe and the US, but at this early stage (pre-marketing to international investors started last Thursday), interest has come mostly from Asia, one of the sources said. The timetable has yet to be determined, but it is possible that it too will launch a roadshow after the lunar new year.
Sinar Mas ended 0.6% higher yesterday at Rp4,525. The share price jumped nearly 140% in 2011 when Indonesia was one of the best performing stock markets in Asia, helped by its strong domestic consumer base.
The company’s earnings have also shown signs of growth. For the year ended December 2010, Sinar Mas booked $141 million in net income, up from $68 million the year before, according to Bloomberg data.
But trading volume in the stock has been thin — on a few occasions last September, a mere 500 shares changed hands, which is only a fraction of the free-float of 2.5 billion shares, according to Bloomberg data.