Thursday, August 15, 2013

Astra and Sinar Mas - 22-Year Performance Comparison


In the early 1990’s I wrote two reports on Indonesian business groups. They were updated in 1997 and 2007.

The reports are deep-dives into Indonesia’s largest conglomerates.   In Asia and most of world outside of the US and the UK, conglomerates are many times referred to as business groups; and designate a grouping of companies controlled by a family or other entity.

The reports examined not only companies that were listed on the stock exchange, but also looked at unlisted companies.  It looked at the key people making decisions at the group rather than company level. The reports dug into the controlling shareholder and his/her extended family, their reputation, and relationships with the government and other business groups. 

While writing and editing the report I and my colleagues would discuss who was good and bad and try to rank the groups by whom we would trust with our own money and which we would recommend to our clients. 

It was a pure subjective process.  The report was qualitative and had no valuations data, projections, or other numbers except for market cap and company ownership.  The reports themselves were more a collection of facts. Some comments were put into the text, but it was mostly factual information.  

My [1] conclusion was that there was a big divergence in the quality of controlling shareholders and that there was a wide variety of corporate structures.

Specifically we thought that the Astra International group stood out as likely being the best or one of the best, corporate citizens in Indonesia    In contrast was the Sinar Mas group came out on the other side of the spectrum.  We did not like them very much at all.  

Astra

Astra was the second largest business group in Indonesia by turnover in 1991.  In August 1991 its three listed companies accounted for 11.8% of the JSE’s market capitalization, the second largest after the Salim Group.  It had five major business lines automobiles, heavy equipment, electronics, wood based industry, and agribusiness.  A family related group called Summa, had interests in financial services, real estate and construction.   We included Summa in the report on Astra as we defined a group as companies controlled by the same family. 

Astra was founded by William Soeryadjaya in 1957. It started as a trading company working with the Sukarno government, where it imported asphalt, construction and road materials.  It is believed that Astra’s early success was due to its close connection with Ibnu Sutowo, the ex-chief of Pertamina, Indonesia’s national oil company; and perhaps IR. Suhartoyo who headed the country’s Department of Industry in the 1970s. Astra survived the downfall of both and by the mid-1970s was able to survive on its own. 

The group later expanded into property and construction, automobile assembly, heavy engineering and plantations. Several of its largest and most lucrative businesses were partnerships with Japanese companies.  The two biggest and most successful were its relationship with Toyota and Komatsu. 

At the time Astra stood out as the only Indonesian conglomerate that had established a professional management structure.  In the 1991 report I wrote, “We consider Astra to be the most ‘corporate’ group amongst all Indonesian conglomerates.  While many Indonesian conglomerates are beginning to professionalize operations, Astra has already done so.”

It was not totally professional as there were family members in leadership positions.  The founder’s brother Benyamin was a commissioner in several more important Astra subsidiaries.  Second son Edwin handled the daily activities of the group, played a role in taking Astra public, and was seen as the group’s next leader. 

Astra went a step further in hiring and giving managerial and decision-making responsibilities to both non- Chinese Indonesians as well as ethnic Chinese-Indonesians.  This was very rare at the time.  Virtually all big businesses in Indonesia at the time were controlled by Indonesian Chinese and non-family employees were typically in the same Chinese dialect group.  They were usually hired more for loyalty than competency.

Astra’s founding family also had a good reputation in Jakarta business circle.  They were considered ‘peranakan’ Indonesian Chinese.  Peranakan refers to South-East Asian ethnic-Chinese that had largely adapted the language and customs of their adapted countries.  

The group also had a good reputation amongst other investors as well as solid minority shareholder.   I wrote, “It is well respected in Indonesia and abroad.  As an example of this, the International Finance Corporation (IFC) has taken a 5.38% equity stake in the listed company and an IFC official sits on the board of PT Astra Inernational”. 

 Like many successful business groups in emerging markets, one of Astra’s key strengths was its being seen as a reliable joint venture partner.   In 1991 I wrote: “Astra has been known by foreigners as a reliable and efficient joint venture partner.  The reputation proved appealing to Toyota, which formed a joint venture, which continues to this day.  The relationship with foreigners, especially Japanese, has given Astra access to more capital than it could raise in Indonesia.” 

The group also had a fairly clean structure with a good alignment between minority and controlling shareholders.   Most of the family’s businesses were under the listed holding company, PT Astra International.    

The listcos however were not in complete alignment with the Soeryadjayas’ family interests.   Founder William Soeryadjaya financed his eldest son Edward’s Summa Group. But at the time they seemed to be operated separately. Summa was Edward’s vehicle and Astra would become younger brother’s vehicle.  I wrote in 1991 that ‘…we believe the two groups are acting independently.  William is believed to be more of a risk-taker than his father or brother Edwin.”[2][3]   

I also wrote in 1991 that the Soeryadjayas agribusiness interests were both within and outside of the listed holding company.  This was another potential conflict between family and corporate resources and attention.  

Despite these two items, Astra had very clean and minority friendly structure compared to the other groups we looked.


Sinar Mas

Sinar Mas was the third largest business group in Indonesia by turnover in 1991.  In August 1991 its four listed companies accounted for 9.6% of the JSE’s market capitalization, the third largest after the Astra and Salim Groups. 

Like Astra, it was controlled by one family; the Widjajas, whose head Eka Tjipta Widjaja was believed to have close relations to the Indonesian military.  I worte, “During the Indonesian revolution, Eka developed a relationship with the Indonesian military by supplying tea, syrup, dried meat and other necessities to the Indonesian forces.  Eka used empty army boats to transport copra around the archipelago and later to Europe.  By the end of the revolution, Eka had plantations producing coffee and rubber.”

Sinar Mas’ more formal origins were typically traced to its 1969 founding of Bimoli.  By the mid-1990s Bimoli was Indonesia’s largest cooking oil brand with an estimated 50% market share. 

Sinar Mas had eight major business lines: banking, finance and insurance; pulp and paper; real estate and property; plantations; food and consumer products; hotels and resorts; and chemicals. 

Unlike Astra, Sinar Mas did not group its varied businesses into one listed holding company.  The group’s structure and vertical integration strategy left open the possibility of transfer pricing between public and privately controlled entities.

Two Sinar Mas listed companies - Indah Kiat and Tjiwi Kimia - were both in the pulp and paper business. “Together they formed the largest fully-integrated pulp and paper manufacturing operations in Asia outside Japan”.   These two were primarily manufacturing companies.  Other companies in the group supplied raw materials and sold finished products. This left open the possibility of buying and selling products to-and-from listed companies also controlled by the Widjaja family. “The group has its own distribution companies to support its paper manufacturers and a 200,000 hectare forest concession in North Sumatra.  Other companies produce finished paper products such as notebooks and other office supplies.”

Further, the family-controlled bank meant that the group could obtain easy funding.  This likely led to poor capital allocation.  In the early 1990s, Indonesian banks were allowed to lend up to 20% of their loan book to related companies.  After BII’s downfall in the Asian Financial Crisis it was revealed that 50% of its loans were to Sinar Mas group companies. 

I did not include it in the 1991 report, but it was an open secret that In addition to his many diverse businesses, Sinar Mas’ founder, Eka Tjipta Widjaja, had a very busy family life.  He reportedly had seven wives and some 30 children. 

I did however write that many of his children from his first marriage were working and leading group companies.   In 1991 one of his daughters, Sukmawati Widjaja, was group CEO and Vice Chairman.  Not much was known about her except that her late husband, Ruby Maeloa was responsible for much of Sinar Mas’ growth in the 1970 and 1980s.   

Eka was considered ‘totok’ Chinese.  This refers to Indonesian Chinese born in China (or their Indonesian born children) who use a Chinese dialect as their primary language and do not identify themselves as Indonesians.  In 1991 I wrote, “He is a totok Chinese and seems quite traditional in his life-style.  His Indonesian has a heavy Ujung Pandang accent and he conducts meetings in Chinese when possible.  It is believed that he prefers to conduct meetings in Chinese or the Ujung Padang dialect”.

We were also told, but did not write, that outside the Widjaja family and a few trusted lieutenants, very few managers in the group had any significant decision making responsibility.   This fit the custom as previously described.

At the time there were also several rumors that Sinar Mas’ pulp, paper, plantation and /or forestry operations were breaking environmental laws.   


Quality Pays

Performance Since 1991

So how would minority investors have done by investing in Astra and Sinar Mas group companies since the September 1991 report?

I always suspected that Astra-listed companies outperformed Sinar Mas ones, but I was surprised by the extent.  In fact the divergence in performance is stunning. 

From the time of publication to now, all three Astra listed companies had positive total returns (i.e. price appreciation and dividend yield).   Astra International’s total return has been 9.5x in USD.  This includes the 1997/98 massive Rupiah depreciation.[4]   United Tractors has done better.  Inventors have been rewarded with 12.4x their money in the same 22 years.

During the same time period all three listed Sinar Mas companies have lost money for anybody that has kept shares for that long.  After 22 years a USD investor in the group’s largest listed company, Indah Kiat, has lost 56% of their investment. 



Performance Since 1998 (height of Asian financial crisis)

The performance since  August 1991 does not take into account market conditions.  It just happened to be when the report was published.  

What about a lucky investor who bought Astra International at the depths of the Asian Financial Crisis and had the fortitude to hold until now?

Astra International hit an all time low during the week of 9 October 1998.  Since then a USD investor would have been rewarded with a return of 207x (or 20,714.5%).  An investment in United Tractors would have done even better returning 1,172x (117,160.0%) over those same 15 years.

The return from the Sinar Mas listed companies was much lower since 1998.  The best was from Tjiwi Kimia.  It returned 72%. A holder of Indah Kiat shares would have lost money.



2002 to Now




I cheated a bit in the above analysis.  I selected a time period when Indonesian domestic oriented stocks were facing a very bleak future, and Astra’s share price was at an all-time low.   


In contrast exporters – such as Indah Kiat and Tjiwi Kimia - stood to benefit from the declining Rupiah. 

Both companies share price performed well during the Asian financial crisis.  For instance, between its December 1997 through and its May 1999 peak Indah Kiat shares price rose by 3.2x.[5] hitting a peak price of rp4,425.  It is now trading at Rp1,230 down 72% in 14 years.
But how would have investor done if we used the same criteria to select the date as we did for Astra?   How would an investor have done if they got into Sinar Mas’ largest listed company at its historic low, and would this have been better than buying shares of the quality group companies? 

Even here Astra vastly outperformed.  Between May 2002 and August 2013 Indah Kiat’s total return was 79.1%.  Astra International’s was more than 12x.   In fact, Astra group companies outperformed by a factor of 6x to 34x, depending on how one pairs the group’s six listed.



Moving On

There are more items to explore.  The comparison is hardly apples-to-apples as the industries that the listed Astra companies are involved in are very different than from the listed Sinar Mas ones.  Besides there are likely additional time periods when Sinar Mas group company shares outperformed Astra company shares.

There is also the sleep-at-night factor.  This is basically how much one worries about their investments.  Since 1991 investors would have lost a lot of sleep with any Indonesian investment, especially during the Asian financial crisis.

But I suspected one would have lost much more sleep if they had held any of the three listed Sinar Mas companies:
  • Both Indah Kiat and Tjiwi Kimia’s shares appear to have been suspended in 1991. 
  • Their parent company, Asia Pulp and Paper (APP) was behind the largest corporate default in history before Worldcom.  It defaulted on some US$12-14bn. 
  • APP’s NYSE shares fell some 98% from its IPO price and were later delisted. 
  • APP and other Sinar Mas companies have been the subject of numerous environmental group criticism.  

Last Thoughts

I’ve been researching business groups off and on since my first Indonesian group report was published 1990.  In the past it has always been a labor of love.  After finishing each one I’ve felt very powerful.  I know who controls what; understand how minority investor interests may be compromised; and have fact-based opinions on which controlling shareholders are good and bad for outside investors. 

What I particularly like about this research is that I look at data points, ask questions and root-out information that others bypass.  This helps me to generate non-consensus investment ideas.  It gives me the courage to buy companies when others are selling and valuations are attractive.

To try to explain this I wrote a short piece where I dubbed my research methodology Research Alpha.  My "Research Alpha" focuses on people, structure and valuation. This is in contrast to bank research that tries to forecast earnings and take a myopic view of a company.   I call this Research Beta (write-up on this is here). 

I used this "Research Alpha" methodology during a personal trip to Greece (write-up is here), in several investments in Asia, and when interviewing hedge fund managers when I was a fund-of-funds professional. 





[1] Much of this blog refers to “A Guide to Indonesian Business Groups”, published in September 1991 by Crosby Research.   Michael McGaughy researched and wrote most of the materials. John Niepold and Alex Wreksoremboko, who were also working at Crosby Research in Indonesia, contributed to the report.   Richard Borsuk, then Asian Wall Street Journal’s chief Indonesian reporter edited and provided feedback on the report. As per company policy at the time, none were credited for their work and no author name(s) appear on the report. 

[2]  A year after the 1991 edition of “A Guide to Indonesian Business Groups” was published, William Soerydjaya lost control of Astra.  He sold the family’s controlling stake in order to rescue his eldest son’s Summa Bank, which had suffered from a credit crisis and finally collapsed.  William Soerydjaya personally guaranteed all Summa Bank deposits using his stake in Astra.  All depositors received their money back with interest, without using any government or outside support. 

[3] After Astra, Edwin Soeryadjaya founded Saratoga Inestama Sedaya, which has sizeable stakes in JSE listed Adaro Energy and Tower Bersama Infrastructure.   Edwin regularly appears on the Indonesian Forbes rich list.

[4] The 1991 report listed the Rupiah at Rp1,951 to US$1. When this was blog was written in mid-August 2013, the exchange rate was Rp10,309 to US$1. 



Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Cambodia's Stock Market - Low Volume

I met with a few brokers in Phnom Phen in early February. Several very kindly put me on their mailing list.  It is nice to get their daily emails as they have very positive stories about new restaurant chains opening in the capital, the country's first ever shopping mall, and the continued expansion of textile and garment manufacturing.  It sounds like the country is rapidly progressing. 

The stock market only has one listed company however.  And even that is not very liquid.  Today's SBI email noted that total traded value today on the entire market was a mere USD15.  Both buying and selling broker can proudly claim 100% of the trading volume. 
Below is a cut-and-paste from today's SBI daily email (15 August 2013). 
================
"PPWSA’s stock closed higher at KHR6,100 (USD1.50) per share, up 1.7% from yesterday’s closing price. Market volume was only 10 shares in turnover of KHR61,000 (USD15). There were 83,245 shares unmatched in the sell side with best offer of 440 shares at price of KHR6,100 and only 5,295 shares unmatched in the buy side with best bid of 677 shares at price of KHR6,040.
"RHB Indochina securities was the sole seller today amounted to 100% of total shares traded while Acleda securities was the sole buyer amounted the same 100%. Local individual investors sold 100% and bought back 100% of the volume whereas foreign investors did not trade for today."

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Bangkok - Changing and Staying the Same

Thailand is, and is not, changing.

That is my impression after a three-day trip to Bangkok to celebrate a friends 50th.  My first trip to Thailand was in 1986 and I've been going back every one-to-three years since.  This was my first time to Thailand in almost exactly two years when I was doing on-the-ground research for Inside Corporate ASEAN. My list of publications can be found here: http://michaelmcgaughy.blogspot.hk/2012/02/publication-list.html

Changing.  Bangkok for the first time feels like a real, first-world cosmopolitan city.  In the past it has always stuck me as a sprawling city in a developing country.  This time the night drive into the city from the airport yielded an urbane skyline, fast expressways and drivers that (mostly) stayed in their lanes. Later in the weekend a crowded BTS and fashionable shopping mall added to this feeling. Dinner, drinks and a terrace view of a concrete jungle reinforced it.

Staying the Same.  However in some ways Bangkok has not changed.

  1. Traffic is still dreadful. It took 1.25 hours to go a few kilometers on a rainy Friday night.   
  2. Politics remains rumour-driven.  My host informed me a few hours after I arrived that he received an SMS/Text stating that there will be a military coup in a few days. (another friend said this is not a rare message to receive)
  3. Thais continue to start interesting consumer products. This is the country that gave us Red Bull.  
The last point is actually the purpose of this post.

The product is called G&G Body Deodorant.  It is for both underarms and feet. Basically a combination of Sure and Odor Eaters.

From a chemist's standpoint this combination may be very logical.  However from my consumer mindset it seems odd. Something that is meant to be spread on my feet does not seem like something that is also meant to spread on my armpits.

It was the only option at the supermarket so I gave it a try.  After a few days in a not-so-hot-Bangkok I found that it worked well.

At least for my upper body.  I still have not tried it on my feet.



The second picture is also from the trip.  It shows the King of Thailand getting haircut from his mother.  In Thailand virtually every retail business and office has a picture of the the king or other members of the royal family centrally displayed.  This was hanging at the Nonglingchee barber shop I tried. Very appropriate.











Monday, July 29, 2013

Good Find - Japanese Version of "The Rise of Capital"

Deep in Taiwan University's library last week I was taken aback when I came across a Japanese version of the Rise of Capital.   I did not know it had been translated into other languages.  Given the book's significance, and the great work by Japanese academics such as Kunio Yoshihara, it should not have come as a surprise.

First published in 1986, The Rise of Capital by Richard Robinson is the best emerging markets finance / investment book I've read.  It outlines the emergence of a domestic capital class in post-colonial Indonesia and the confluence of politics and business that nurtured it .  It noted that many of the firms and businesses that did well under Sukarno, had a hard time after Soeharto came to power.  

The book filled in many gaps in my understanding of how business operates in Indonesia. It showed that the Jakarta listed companies I was analyzing were typically a small part of very large conglomerates.  The book highlighted that many of the business group founders were related, did business together and typically had strong political ties.  Later I learned that a similar structure is found in all non-Anglo Saxon economies that I've looked at.   

Ever since reading the book I spend more time looking at the people behind the listed companies, what else they own and how this might affect the listed companies. I've also written several reports on the corporate backgrounds of many of Asia's bigger business groups.  Most of this is targeted to large investors (publication list here: http://michaelmcgaughy.blogspot.hk/2012/02/publication-list.html..).  

In the last couple of years I've been investing my own funds using key leanings from The Rise of Capital and my own bottom-up research.  Results have mostly been better than expected. 









Thursday, July 11, 2013

Book Review - Supermoney by Adam Smith

I came across Supermoney in a list of investment books.  I forget whose list recommended it, but suspect it was more than one.   So I'm now guilty for not giving credit to the site and peerson(s) who turned me onto the book, as I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Published 41 years ago (1972), I was surprised by how much the investment world today is similar to the one described. In 1972 the US equity indexes were not doing well after the market boom of early-and mid-1960s.  The Dow fell some 35% between 1968 and mid-1970 when I image the bulk of the writing was done. It was not until 1985 that a sustained bull market started.

The book highlights deals gone bad, investment managers overpaying for growth, and the rejection of hedge funds and finance as a career by university graduates.

Despite the plethora of investment books, academic papers, investor newsletters, magazine articles, and blogs that highlight the fallacy of accounting; market booms and busts, under and overvaluation of asset prices, financial crisis, etc., our basic greed and fear mentality remain intact.

I found Supermoney to be relevant to Asia today.  This is because the equity markets and ownership pattern in my part of the world seem to be very similar his description of America 40-60 years ago. (I live in Hong Kong).

Below are some observations linked to quotations from the book.  I've added comments and examples


More regulation after a downturn
"The involvement of Congress in passing the Securities Investor Protection Act means a continuing involvement of Congress; the government rarely leaves any endeavor where it has created additional staff". 

MM comment: think about the rapid increase in financial regulation after 2008's crash.


Currency debasing as cause of national decline
Quoting The International Harry Schultz Letter: "A people can only sink lower without a dependable store of value.  Currency debauchery is the sole source of US decline and decadence - just as it has been in every society of recorded history." 

MM comment: think of most macro-economic commentators now


Giving Investors What They Want
"The supply of growth companies grew to meet the demand." 

MM Comment: think about the large increase in US listed Chinese companies


Fallacy of Nicely Growing Earnings 
"Everywhere you looked, there was a company with a neat stepladder of growing earnings.  Some kept the stepladder right up to the day they filed for bankruptcy." 

MM comment: think about Worldcom and Bernie Madoff


Fallacy of Corporate Accounts
"What did it mean to have distinguished accounting name on reports?", "'Nothing,' said Thornton O'Glove, an accountant who writes a newsletter on accounting for a Wall Street firm, 'The signature is worthless.'"

Quoting Leonard Spacek, then a senior partner and chairman emeritus of Arthur Anderson & Company, one of America's Big Eight accountanting firms at the time: "How my profession can tolerate such fiction and look the public in the eye is beyond my understanding.  I suppose the answer lies in the fact that if your living depends on playing poker, you can easily develop a poker face.  My profession appears to regard a set of financial statements as a roulette while to the public investor - and it is his tough luck if he doesn't understand the risks that we inject into accounting reports."

MM comment: I continue to hear about accounting frauds and accountants on the take in Mainland China.


Hedge Funds Attracting the Greedy
Quoting a former dean of Harvard Business School admissions,"'Last year,' I said,' my classes all wanted to go right to work for a hedge fund.  You couldn't even offer them twenty thousand a year, because they were going to run five million into ten in a year and take twenty percent of the gain. I used to say, 'Good morning, greedy little bastards.'"

MM comment: reminds me of last few years in the US


On Malthus and the futility of making forecasts (my favorite quote so far)
"If you had assumed our population growth in 1880 without the automobile, you could have assumed asphyxiation by horse manure".  

MM comment: most forecasts just don't work (i.e. The Signal and the Noise by Nate Sliver)

---

The author sounds a bit like the Michael Lewis of the late-60s to early-90s.  'Adam Smith' is actually George Goodman, a Rhodes Scholar.  According to Wikipedia he was in the US Army Special Forces' intelligence group concentrating on psychological warfare.  In the mid-80s he started Adam Smith's Money World which ran on America's respectable Public Broadcasting System (PBS). The program won five Emmy Awards. He also wrote three novels and spent time in Hollywood writing screen plays.








Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Book Review - YK Pao, My Father

I was thrilled to get this book fresh from HK University Press.  I've heard about YK Pao for many
years and always had a favourable impression of him and the business empire he built.  But actually I knew very little about him, and his two largest companies - World Wide Shipping and Wharf/Wheelock  - as he was retiring about the same time I was starting as an analyst in Asia.

For those who don't know, YK Pao built the world's largest shipping company in twenty years from a single used ship he purchased in 1955.  By the mid-70s he was on the cover of Time magazine.  He later went on to acquire the Wharf/Wheelock group which was the first ethnic Chinese takeover of a British owned 'hong', or trading house.  His net worth when he passed away in 1990 was estimated at some US$11b.  Along the way he met and built relations with some of the world's most influential people including Deng Xiaoping, Margaret Thatcher, and Li Ka-shing, amongst many others.

My perception of him was that of an old-school, Ningbo-to-Shanghai-to-post-liberation-Hong Kong transplant doing do the right thing for himself, his family, as well as the greater community.   With the book being written by his daughter I suspect this image would be reinforced.

And it was.  His daughter is certainly filial and after putting the book down, it was hard to remember any faults, bad habits or annoying traits that her father possessed.  But then I doubt I would be very objective when writing about my own flesh-and-blood.  Despite the lack of objectivity, the book provides good insight into the history of a self-made man who through hard work, connections and good fortune made a lot of money - and did a lot of good.

Perhaps the most insightful section was about YK Pao and his family's relationship with Deng Xiaoping and his family.  Deng Xiaoping is a personal hero of of mine and this is insight I had not been aware of.

The book notes that YK Pao appears to have been one of the closest non-Mainland confidants to Deng Xiaoping.  This closeness and YK Pao's international experience, contacts and stature helped on several fronts.  This included building the first foreign funded hotel in China, setting up one of the first private-government joint-ventures (for the hotel), and smoothing China-British relations in negotiating Hong Kong's return to Mainland China.

There is also good insight into HK business circles of the 60s and 70s. Particularly how YK Pao's good relationship with senior HSBC bankers and Li Ka-shing  helped him to outbid Jardines in taking  control of Wharf/Wheelock.

The book also provides good insight into the Pao family and his four daughters.  They all married people from different backgrounds.  The author and oldest marrying an ethnic European, the second a Hong Kong raised Shanghainese, the third to an American of Japanese ancestry, and the youngest to a successful Hong Kong businessman.

Despite his initial objection to his eldest daughter not marrying an ethnic Chinese, once her decision was final and the marriage complete, YK Pao brought him into the business on equal footing as he did his three other son-in-laws.  I suspect this was very forward and open-minded from someone in the late 1960s.  Especially from a man who lived in 1930/40s Shanghai when ethnic Chinese were prohibited from entering 'public' parks located in the European concessions.

Keeping with the tradition of handing the business to his sons, YK split his businesses into four parts - one for each son-in-law. The largest and central business - shipping - went to the eldest son-in-law, despite his European heritage.  The second largest business, Wharf/Wheelock went to the second-eldest.

The book also highlights YK Pao's charitable works.  Like other successful entrepreneurs he never forgot his roots and he and his daughters have given generously to educational and other institutions in the family's hometown of Ningbo, as well as Shanghai, Hong Kong and other places.

The book is an easy read, a good insight into one of the wealthiest and more charitable families in Asia, and is highly recommended for readers who are interested in gaining insight into one of modern Asia's true builders. 

My biggest criticism is not the lack of objectivity, but lack of an index.  There is a great deal of valuable information that scholars and others would/should value but is hard to find to without an index.  This oversight is especially surprising as it given its academic linked publisher.







Thursday, June 13, 2013

Look at the big picture. Feel good.

Look at the big picture.  Feel good.

Thanks to the folks at Gave-Kal for alerting me to the following webpage.

http://www.businessinsider.com/charts-that-will-restore-your-faith-in-humanity-2013-5